RESOLUTIONS OF THE PLENUM OF THE SUPREME COURT AS A NORMATIVE-GUIDING SOURCE IN THE QUALIFICATION OF CRIMINAL ACTS: EVIDENCE FROM UZBEKISTAN

Authors

  • Razzoq S.Altiyev 1 Автор

Abstract

The paper examines the role of the resolutions of the Plenum of the Supreme Court and of generalisations of judicial practice in the qualification of criminal acts. Drawing on a corpus of 59 Plenum resolutions (56 unique), 74 judicial documents and 11 quarterly and annual reviews, the author argues that in a codified system such resolutions constitute neither a formal source of law nor a mere recommendation, but a normative-guiding, de facto binding source — a “soft precedent”. A two-tier architecture of Plenum guidance, coupled with a feedback loop through statistical reviews, is proposed. 

 

Downloads

Published

2026-08-14

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 8 (2026)

Section

Статьи

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

By submitting a paper to the conference organized by Academic Publishing House, the author(s) agree to the following license terms and conditions:

1. Copyright and Licensing

  1. The author(s) retain the copyright of their article.
  2. The author(s) grant Academic Publishing House a non-exclusive license to publish, distribute, and archive the submitted material in both electronic and print formats.
  3. The work will be published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, allowing others to share and adapt the material for any purpose, provided proper credit is given to the original author(s).

2. Author’s Responsibilities

  1. The author(s) guarantee that the submitted work is original, does not infringe any existing copyrights, and has not been published or submitted elsewhere.
  2. The author(s) confirm that all co-authors have approved the final version of the manuscript and agree with its submission and publication.
  3. The author(s) are fully responsible for the accuracy of the data, citations, and references provided in the article.

3. Publisher’s Rights

  1. Academic Publishing House reserves the right to edit, format, and make minor grammatical or layout corrections to the paper without altering its core content.
  2. The publisher has the right to include the article in indexing databases, archives, and repositories such as Google Scholar, Zenodo, OpenAIRE, and other partner platforms.
  3. The publisher may promote the paper through its website and official social media channels.

4. Open Access Policy

All conference papers are published as open access, ensuring free and permanent online access to the full text of all articles immediately upon publication.

5. Withdrawal and Retraction

If ethical misconduct, plagiarism, or data manipulation is detected, Academic Publishing House reserves the right to withdraw or retract the publication at any stage.

6. Acceptance of Terms

Submission of a manuscript to the conference implies that the author(s) have read, understood, and accepted these License Terms.

How to Cite

Altiyev, R. (2026). RESOLUTIONS OF THE PLENUM OF THE SUPREME COURT AS A NORMATIVE-GUIDING SOURCE IN THE QUALIFICATION OF CRIMINAL ACTS: EVIDENCE FROM UZBEKISTAN . International Conference on Engineering & Technology, 2(8), 16-19. https://uniconflix.com/index.php/ICET/article/view/5666