Complaints & Appeals
Complaints & Appeals
Scope
This policy covers complaints relating to:
- The editorial process (timeliness, communication, decision quality)
- The peer-review process (perceived bias, conflicts of interest, professionalism)
- Editorial decisions (rejection, requested revisions)
- Publication ethics matters (authorship disputes, undeclared conflicts, suspected misconduct)
- Conduct of editors, reviewers, authors or staff
How to submit a complaint
- Send a written complaint to info@uniconflix.com
- Include: complainant identity, manuscript ID (if applicable), specific concern, supporting evidence, requested resolution
- Anonymous complaints are accepted but may limit our ability to investigate
Investigation process
- Acknowledgement: within 3 business days
- Triage: assignment to the appropriate person (Managing Editor, Editor-in-Chief or independent Ethics Officer)
- Investigation: review of facts, consultation with involved parties, reference to COPE flowcharts
- Resolution: within 30 days for routine complaints; longer for complex cases requiring external advice
- Communication: written response to the complainant with outcome and any corrective actions
Appeals of editorial decisions
Authors who disagree with an editorial decision may appeal in writing within 30 days of the decision letter.
- The appeal must clearly state the grounds (e.g., factual errors in the review, reviewer bias)
- Appeals are reviewed by an independent editor not involved in the original decision
- The decision on appeal is final
External escalation
Where internal resolution is not satisfactory, complainants may contact:
- Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) for ethics-related concerns
- The complainant's institutional research integrity office
Confidentiality and retaliation
All complaints are treated confidentially to the extent compatible with thorough investigation. No retaliation against good-faith complainants is permitted.